Wednesday, 14 December 2016

holiday h/w - George transcript


Young readers should be corrected whenever they make a mistake

Positive Reinforcement is a vital aspect for a child to learn when they have used language grammatically correct. When George struggles to pronounce the low frequency lexis ‘sandbags’, his Mother uses the strategy of telling George to pronounce the individual phonemes which make up the compound word. By it being a compound word, George struggles with the unstressed sound of the grapheme‘d’ so when pronounced grammatically correct, his Mother enforces praise with ‘well done’ and therefore positive reinforcement.  Because George has identified that his Mother praises him when he does something correctly, later on in the transcript, George seeks positive reinforcement with the cloaked imperative ‘but he isn’t letting them get inside is he’. Although this question implies George already knows the answer, he is seeking reassurance from his Mother and gets it when she replies with ‘no’ which shows she agrees with him.

To allow a young reader to know when they have made a mistake, their face needs should be encountered for is you want to make a positive difference. When George misses out to pluralise the concrete noun ‘house’, his Mother picks up on him miscuing the ending so goes with the strategy of spelling out the phonemes he missed as she found this technique worked previous.  She follows on from this with a bold on record utterance ‘watch the endings’. Although this can be seen as a harsher more forward way to correct an early reader, by helping George via breaking up the phonemes first, mitigates the utterance. His Mother follows on with allowing George know he made another mistake with ‘nooo’ . The over-expanded use of the grapheme ‘o’, mitigates this negative reinforcement as she is caring for Georges face needs by not wanting him to feel of a lower status. This supports Goodman’s ‘Top Down’ approach with the Mother not giving George the answer but instead, allows him to self-correct.

Vygotsky believes that the help of others via scaffolding will improve a child’s understanding of something they do not already know, but will, with the help of an adult. George’s Mother uses scaffolding when she breaks up the compound word ‘sandbags’ into the separate concrete nouns ‘sand’ and ‘bags’. By George copying his Mother without being asked to, implies he wants to learn how to annunciate it clearly, as well as his Mother wanting him to with her praising him after with positive reinforcement of ‘well done’ . However, at the end of the transcript, George’s Mother immediately corrects his word-guessing error of ‘made’ with the correct word ‘may’.  The reason behind this may to preserve the flow of the utterance with the sentence George reading out, being relatively long. It could also be to keep George’s attention as he has been given lots of new information throughout the transcript and so may not remember anymore.

All in all, I believe a young reader should be corrected when they have made a mistake. This is because it allows them to identify a mistake in the future and hopefully self-correct, and the use of praise via positive reinforcement is important to allow the child know when they have pronounced everything correctly.

Friday, 2 December 2016

work in absence- 28th/29th


Reading words and saying them allowed seems to be an easy task many people undertake every day, But we do not understand the complexity of the cognitive processes which occur for one to read and speak words. The ‘children of the code project’ say that it is artificial for people to read an alphabetical orthography as the complex cognitive interaction, when the brain and environment work together, is unnatural. In history, children were not made to learn how to read until the King of Sweden made every child in his Kingdom learn. The defective orthography to read and take in information is a technical cognitive process supporting how the codes are confusing. Inconsistency of phonemes such as the morpheme ‘O’ is a challenge which takes time to understand as you cannot see how a morpheme is needed to be pronounced by the orthography. Turning this orthography to phonography is a particular language itself, coordinating different parts of the brain at once: from the temporal lobe- memory- , the Wernicke and Broca- for spoken language- and the occipital lobe for reading the orthography.

The power of writing allows an individual to appreciate the words in which we speak. When you start writing, only then you can refer back to what you have written unlike speech when you say what you think without reflecting on what you just said as you can think about your thoughts. The power of writing is underrated with people not understanding how writing allows you to really think about the words.  When you speak, you do not think about the spelling of the word and you will only be able to learn the spelling once you put pen to paper. Even on the computer, you are able to auto-correct the spelling of words without taking the role of the cognitive process to fully learn the correct spelling. This could be why people do not appreciate the power of writing as much as they did when reading and writing was first brought about. John Searle concludes the power of writing by saying ‘you would not be able to think as well as you can think if you didn’t have the word written down’.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0n1LHCqbNs – what’s so difficult>?