The refugee crisis

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/04/syrian-refugee-crisis-why-has-it-become-so-bad
http://sunnewsonline.com/new/uk-to-accept-20000-refugees-from-syria-by-2020/

Both of these articles about the refugee crisis emphasis how important help and aid are needed in Syria.The guardian have included how rich countries have been helping Syria and its people " rich countries have given to UNHCR to deal with the problem – leaving a gap of almost 40% between what it needs and what has been donated."This suggests that countries that can afford to help have been and therefore shows sympathy and love between countries-when it comes down to the people within the countires,everyone is willing to help.Because they have left "a gap of almost 40%" implies that they have given all that they can.On the other hand it could be down the  "UN bodies working with millions of refugees in Jordan, Turkey and Lebanon are complaining that they are running out of money".Because they are "complaining" gives the impression that they arent grateful for the money that has been given;making the rich countires who have donated being left feeling annoyed and frustrated as they have helped out of choice.
The second Article has also spoken about the help and aid given to Syrians but unlike The guardian which have spoken about the help given from rich countires, The Sun have only just spoken about what the UK have gave "The UK will accept up to 20,000 refugees from Syria over the next five years, David Cameron has told MPs".As this is the first sentence in the whole article,it expresses how important The Sun sees it as being and that people of Britain need to see how considerate David Cameron is being (which gives the impression that he may well be trying to win support as it makes him seem more kindearted).The word "accept" suggests that the UK dont really want the Syrian refugees in its however out of kindness are giving them concent.

Both of these articles also talk about how the help towards Syrians will be in years to come and after they have made to move into there countries.The first article talks about what Turkey have done with taking in refugees." Turkey is not a country for people to stay in for the long term... taking in about 2 million Syrian refugees. But Syrians do not have the right to work there legally"Although Turkey dont want to make them citizens of there country and stay there perminently they have still taken in a stagering "2 million Syrian refugees".
This is different to the Uk which have said that the refugees "can stay for five years, have the right to work and access public funds. After five years they can apply to settle in the UK." This suggests that when it comes to stability within its own conutry,the Uk is all for and and feel more comfortable when it comes to helping within its own country.Unlike Turkey which have stated that refugees cant "work there legally"Britain are allowing refugees start a new life in the Uk which will make Syrains feel more welcomed.However by using the statement "have the right to" gives the impression that they are under strict rules and what the government tell them to do, they have to obey.This is different to the first article from The Guardian as Turkey are making the refugees not feel as welcome and want them out of there hair as soon as they can.